This just about summed up how clapped out and inane the contemporary art scene is….not content with just posing inane speculative theory grounded in nothing or as Bourriaud states..
Like modernism and postmodernism, though, itâ€™s not easy to sum up in a sentence. When I ask for the one-line Wikipedia version of the theory, Â Bourriaud is cautious, saying it is a Âcomplex idea that canâ€™t be simplified (FYI, Wikipedia defines altermodern as â€œan Âattempt at branding art made in todayâ€™s global Âcontextâ€ and says itâ€™s part of a commercialism backlash).
Bourriaud, who co-founded Paris gallery Palais de Tokyo and has Âwritten influentialÂ tomes on art theory, describes todayâ€™s superstars like Hirst as making â€œvery static artworksâ€ which are on their way out.
from The London Paper
Well there you have it – it too sophisticated to be explained…..I was going to give it benefit of doubt but when I see an article proclaiming a ‘new world order’ illustrated by a picture of a man wearing a badger on his head ( Marcus Coates – I kid you not:-) here it is…well what point satirising..it done for me…)
The basis of alter modernism is ‘it moves around a bit’ ..because of age of mass travel stupid artists can move around the globe being well..stupid and that’s ok?
The fact that it attempts to replace ‘postmodernism’ ( i.e. real theories based in real world) with a theory based on ‘travel’ just at point where the collapse of capitalism will mean fewer artists travelling ..indeed most will find it hard getting work of any kind is ludicrous in the extreme. Like many so-called ‘movements’ before the design of the catalogue is good (..proper design agency Paris involved) and we have the conceit of welding disparate concerns into a box of the curator’s ideas…(typical posture – there been goodness how many attempts in last two decades to get WOW factor moving again post..’Sensation’ Saatchi’s ragbag advertising coup which enfeebled subsequent generations of British artists). So now we all ‘altermodern’. Bullshit.
Bourriaud is a typical game-player and self-publicist and shame on the Tate for falling for his inept trendy theories and shocking lack of substance but as we live in an age of form over content and curator over artist I am no longer surprised. There will be decent work in the show even Bourriaud will get it right occasionally but as for a new movement….just ask Friends of the Earth or any serious grounded envoronmental artist if the new world order one of travel…exactly…
Maybe curators can travel first class in the new world order…for the rest of us its buses and tubes as usual and drivel from on high whether it be banker or man with badger on head……
Love to hear Brian Sewell on this…for now Ben Lewis does a lovely job on it
From Moogee on Guardian blog in response to Charlotte Higgins on Wallinger’s Geegee..
As Marcus Coates is presently being touted as a symbol of Nicholas Bourriaud’s ‘Altermodern New World Order’ for wearing a badger on his head maybe we could build a statue of Nicholas with his head up a horse’s rear instead?
Thereby we would not only be creating a visual affirmation of our own cutting-edgeness but also showing a clear sign to our continental knowledge economy rivals of how brilliant we are….of course it would not be built of local cement that no longer exists….a bit like the Oxford Mini..a casualty of global market I’m afraid but the frisson of the impermanent would tie in beautifully with the altermodern golbal perspective…in fact lets retrain all the unemployed car workers to be curators ..
On second thought lets just forget the whole thing and spend the money wisely instead ….a very modernist idea whose time may finally have come….
CODA 2 and 3
Wallinger is a ray of sunshine in a bleak artworld..I like Charlotte will look forward to the show..
see my comment on M.W. from 2008 here..
A more compliant bunch than that would be hard to find. Indeed Wallinger stands out as one of few artists who had more in common with the left wing artists of 1970â€™s e.g. Conrad Atkinson than their cash-laden capitalist benefactors. To see how the colour supplement crowd actually got into bed with mass-marketing (most notably with Charles S.) and how that coincided with a lot of spare â€˜profitâ€™ from banking in late 1980â€™s is a book unwrittenâ€¦they went hand in hand of courseâ€¦.
how the hell did he end up being involved in something as rightwing as spurious regeneration
If his politics are to be believed ( and I do believe he sincere) did he do it for a joke and it all gone terribly wrong….???
I just read Jilly Cooper on said horse…it so stunningly idiotic a piece of writing it defies satire..just read it for oneself….
British culture is in safe hands….or should that be whip hand?
I wonder if she would have said same if it had been a giant statue of a car worker with his nether regions exposed towards Europe?….
the enthusiasm may not be so great then eh Jilly
toodle pip darlings….
One thought on “Altermodernism is the new world order…discuss..”
I’ve been to see it and there were some good aspects: BUT! the idea that pieces were going to be created each week based on a “discussion” taking place between certain artists suggested that the whole concept is a synthetic construction made to group together some random elements of modern art. Artists should “incidentally” form a movement – but here they are in danger of making art FOR the movement – which completely goes against what it should be about and you have a very good point when you describe Bourriaud as a “game-player”. There were some elements that could soon form something good – but they were interspersed with elements of kitsch modern art which was too tacky to represent any definitive movement: the badger hat in particular.